16 SEP 2011 by ideonexus

 Darwin Considers Intermediaries Between Species

I have found it difficult, when looking at any two species, to avoid picturing to myself, forms directly intermediate between them. But this is a wholly false view; we should always look for forms intermediate between each species and a common but unknown progenitor; and the progenitor will generally have differed in some respects from all of its modified descendants.
Folksonomies: evolution missing links
Folksonomies: evolution missing links
  1  notes

But recognizes that this line of thinking is misleading, because species have common ancestors that are something different from both their descendants.

19 MAY 2011 by ideonexus

 Missing Links Make Defining Species Possible

As we trace the ancestry of modern Homo sapiens backwards, there must come a time when the difference from living people is sufficiently great to deserve a different specific name, say Homo ergaster. Yet, every step of the way, individuals were presumably sufficiently similar to their parents and their children to be placed in the same species. Now we go back further, tracing the ancestry of Homo ergaster, and there must come a time when we reach individuals who are sufficiently different fro...
  1  notes

Without missing links, species would blur into each other.